Categories: Gas

by Gabriel Klaasen

Share

Categories: Gas

by Gabriel Klaasen

Share

by Jan Cronje

29 April 2021

 

Karpowership

Karpowership SA, the company bidding to moor five powerships in South African harbours for 20 years, cleared another hurdle when its environmental assessors found that the projects at the ports of Saldanha Bay, Richards Bay and Ngqura could go ahead.

Balito-based Triplo4, which carried out the assessments on behalf of Karpowership SA, submitted the final environmental impact assessments for the three ports earlier in the week, following a period of public comment. It found that the projects should go ahead, subject to a number of mitigations measures.

Green groups have slammed the project, arguing the powerships will be bad for the environment, expensive and risk becoming obsolete.

It will now be up to the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment to grant or refuse authorisation. The department has 57 days to study the reports and come to a decision. After the department makes its decision, there will be an opportunity to appeal.

Karpowership SA has been named a preferred bidder in the department of energy’s Risk Mitigation IPP Procurement Programme (RMIPPPP) to fast-track about 2 000 MW of new power production from independent producers to cut down on load shedding.

The group has bid to moor

  • one powership producing 415 MW of electricity from natural gas, and one additional ship used for LNG, known as a floating storage regasification unit (FSRU) at the port of Saldanha Bay;
  •  two powerships producing 540 MW of electricity and one FSRU at the port of Richards Bay; and
  •  two powerships producing 540 MW of electricity and one FSRU at the port of Port of Ngqura within the Coega Special Economic Zone.

All the ships will produce electricity from natural gas.

20-year agreements 

If Karpowership SA is successful in obtaining environmental authorisation from the DFFE and other outstanding approvals, the department of energy intends to sign 20-year  power purchase agreements with it.

According to an estimate prepared by the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, the powerships could cost SA between R160 billion and R218 billion over their 20-year lifespan.

But some energy analysts have questioned the need for SA to conclude 20-year agreements, as that the international norm for using “emergency” powerships was around three to five years.

“No-one has ever signed a 20-year contract for powerships. They offer a short-term emergency power option when there are no alternatives,” UCT Professor Anton Eberhard previously told Fin24.

Officials from the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy, which oversaw the RMIPPPP, have defended the 20-year agreements, saying they are necessary to keep costs down.

“The [20-year agreements] enable projects to recover deployed capital as well as operating costs at a rate and pace that does not make it unaffordable to buyer and therefore the end user,” the department’s Deputy Director General, Jacob Mbele, told Parliament last week.

The explanation did little to reassure some MPs on Parliament’s oversight committee on mineral resources and energy, who want the committee to probe how the RMIPPPP bids were awarded.

However the committee on Wednesday blocked a proposed probe into the bids tabled by DA MP Kevin Mileham. Mileham received no cross-party support and a vote to launch a probe failed. ANC MPs on the committee critcised Mileham’s proposal, with Sibusiso Kula questioning why he was “casting aspersions” on the bid process without evidence.

“I don’t think we are at a point in time where we ought be entertaining things such as investigations,” said Kula, adding that department of energy had cleared up any “doubts, concerns and misconceptions”.

STAY IN THE LOOP

Subscribe to our free newsletter.

Business Report 1 July 2012. Optimal Energy chief executive Kobus Meiring is a disappointed man. The company is the developer of South Africa’s electric car but it officially closed on Friday with the loss of about 60 jobs. This follows its failure to get further funding from the government and the Industrial Development Corporation (IDC)... http://www.iol.co.za/business/business-news/why-sa-s-electric-car-is-not-going-anywhere-1.1331580#.T_E37xcjGq8

Related Posts

  • By Susan Comrie for amaBhungane 19 Jul 2022 original article here Amidst an unprecedented load shedding crisis, the Central Energy Fund is pushing ahead with Energy Minister Gwede Mantashe’s plan to build a ‘gas bridge’ to Mozambique, while Eskom calls for up to 6,000 megawatts of new gas-fired power to urgently be added to the grid. […]

  • by Fiona Harvey 10 May 2022 original article here Countries should Analysis says countries can save money by switching from coal straight to renewable energies An interconnection gas hub in Baumgarten an der March, Austria. High prices for gas have reversed the logic of using it as a ‘transition’ fuel. Photograph: Joe Klamar/AFP/Getty   move from […]

  • By Tony Carnie 30 Mar 2022 original article here ‘Energy security should be based on science, not narrow, short-sighted political and vested interests. History will judge the current South African government harshly if it fails to act decisively now for the sake of its people and the greater good of the planet.’ Three senior local scientists […]

  • 24.03.2022 by Lameez Omarjee original article here   Energy Minister Gwede Mantashe is “enthused” by the prospect of gas discoveries, as it will attract foreign investment. The gas industry, which is currently being developed, will support the country’s energy transition in a big way, he said. Domestic gas resources will eliminate the need for imports, […]