by Peter
Share
by Peter
Share
State-owned power utility Eskom indicated during a court hearing on Friday that it would not seek to recover more than R23-billion in additional revenue through the tariff during its 2021/22 financial year, implying that any possible hike implemented on April 1 would be capped at about 15.5%.
Advocate Matthew Chaskalson, who acted for Eskom, also told Justice Joseph Raulinga that any amount less than R23-billion would be financially unsustainable for the utility and potentially “socially disastrous”, as yet more fiscal resources would have to be diverted from other social needs to shore up Eskom’s finances.
Eskom approached the court last year to have R23-billion of a larger R69-billion equity injection, unlawfully removed by the National Energy Regulator of South Africa (Nersa) from its allowable revenue, added back during the upcoming financial year.
The application was made using Section 18 of the Superior Courts Act in a bid to have orders made in a July 28, 2020, High Court judgment executed, pending an appeal of the judgment to the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA).
The High Court ruled that Nersa’s decision to exclude a R69-billion government equity injection from Eskom’s allowable revenue was unlawful and ordered that an amount of R23-billion be added back during Eskom’s 2021/22 financial year.
The R46-billion balance should be placed, the order stated, in the 2022/23 and 2023/24 tariff years, which would fall under the next multiyear determination period, yet to be adjudicated by the regulator.
In a hearing held virtually in line with Covid-19 precautions, Chaskalson argued that the court-ordered amount could be offset against revenue already secured in recent determinations made by Nersa.
The day before the hearing, Nersa announced that Eskom was entitled to recover an additional R6.6-billion in the upcoming financial year, in line with its decision that half of the R13.2-billion granted to Eskom following its adjudication of a 2018/19 regulatory clearing account (RCA) application be liquidated in 2021/22.
In addition, Nersa announced that Eskom would be allowed to claw back a further R6-billion, following a court-ordered re-adjudication of three RCA applications for the 2014/15 to 2016/17 financial years and a supplementary tariff application for the 2018/19 financial year.
However, Nersa did not announce an implementation timetable, indicating that the final liquidation schedule would be decided only by late February.
Chaskalson said that Eskom was, therefore, requesting a court order granting it a further R16.4-billion to close the residual gap between the additional revenue officially approved by Nersa and the R23-billion required to remain financially sustainable.
Should Nersa allow for the full additional R6-billion approved on January 28 to be liquidated in 2021/22, the amount granted by the court could be reduced to about R10-billion.
Ahead of the hearing, Nersa confirmed that the 2021/22 tariff increase would be higher than the 5.22% increase originally sanctioned as part of the fourth multiyear price determination, made in early 2019.
The liquidation of half of the R13.2-billion approved following Eskom’s 2018/19 RCA would translate to a hike of 8.12%. Should the full additional amount of R6-billion approved on January 28 be recovered in the same financial year, the tariff increase would be 10.95%, or should only half were liquidated 9.53%.
In response to Eskom’s application to have the 2021/22 tariff hike supplemented further through a court order, Nersa’s advocate, Ngwako Maenetje, argued that the utility’s application should be rejected, as it failed to meet the threshold required by the Section 18 of the Superior Courts Act.
Eskom not only had to prove that it would be irreparably harmed should the order not be executed, but that Nersa would suffer no irreparable harm. In addition, it had to prove that there were exceptional circumstances that made it necessary for the court to intervene.
Maenetje argued that the recent adjudications made by Nersa to grant Eskom additional revenue would be sufficient to militate against the utility succumbing to a liquidity crisis in the upcoming financial year.
He also argued that there was sufficient scope for Eskom to recover the disallowed revenue through the RCA mechanism.
By contrast, Maenetje argued that both Nersa and electricity consumers would suffer irreparable harm in the event that the order was executed, and the regulator prevailed in its SCA appeal.
He also argued that the circumstances were not exceptional, arguing that a review of a decision of a regulator by an aggrieved applicant was a “routine occurrence”.
Chaskalson put forward several reasons for why the circumstances were exceptional, including the “unprecedented” misappropriation of a government equity injection, Nersa delays and a “contemptuous” public statement of Nersa’s Nhlanhla Gumede, who in an ENCA interview gave the categorical assurance that High Court order would be implemented.
Maenetje argued that Gumede’s statements had been explained in an affidavit, indicating that they were made on the basis that Nersa had decided to take the order on appeal.
Raulinga reserved judgment, but indicated he was aware of the fact that it should be made well ahead of the March 15 deadline for Eskom to submit its tariffs for approval in line with the Municipal Finance Management Act.
STAY IN THE LOOP
Subscribe to our free newsletter.
Tangled web of Eskom has little to do with electricity By MJ (Thinus) Booysen Follow 14 Dec 2022 2 Professor MJ (Thinus) Booysen is Research Chair in Internet of Things and Director of the MTN Mobile Intelligence Research Laboratory in the Faculty of Engineering, Stellenbosch University: www.thinus.co.za The technical and economic challenges in South Africa’s energy crisis […]
By Ethan van Diemen 26 Jul 2022 original article here President Cyril Ramaphosa on Monday night announced what he called an ‘energy action plan’ to tackle South Africa’s power crisis. This is what the plan entails. On Monday night, President Cyril Ramaphosa announced a set of actions to respond to South Africa’s yearslong energy crisis. “The […]
4TH JULY 2022 BY: TERENCE CREAMER original article here Electricity utility Eskom is developing a Web-based portal that will offer real-time visibility of locations in South Africa where new generators can be immediately or easily connected to the grid. The utility has, for the past three years, been arguing that between 4 000 MW and 6 000 MW of additional capacity is […]
By Queenin Masuabi 04 Jul 2022 original article here The ANC’s National Executive Committee (NEC) sat for a virtual meeting on Monday in which a number of key issues were discussed – including Eskom and its inability to keep the lights on. Conversations around load shedding and Eskom took place on Monday during the ANC’s […]